<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Attorney.org &#187; Laws</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.attorney.org/category/laws/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.attorney.org</link>
	<description>All Legal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 20:20:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The Truth About Nuclear Power</title>
		<link>http://www.attorney.org/nuclear-power.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.attorney.org/nuclear-power.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Image Gallery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contaminate planet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear plant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.attorney.org/?p=709</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nuclear power has been touted as a &#8220;clean&#8221; source of energy and the next answer to global warming.
However, the cleanliness of nuclear power is nonsense. Not only does it contaminate the planet with radioactive waste, it is a significant contributor to global warming.
It&#8217;s true, there is little to no fossil fuel used in actually producing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_711" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><img class="size-full wp-image-711" title="Nuclear Power Plant" src="http://www.attorney.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Nuclear-Power-Plant.jpg" alt="Nuclear Power Plant" width="480" height="270" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Nuclear Power Plant</p></div>
<div>Nuclear power has been touted as a &#8220;clean&#8221; source of energy and the next answer to global warming.</p>
<p>However, the cleanliness of nuclear power is nonsense. Not only does it contaminate the planet with radioactive waste, it is a significant contributor to global warming.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s true, there is little to no fossil fuel used in actually producing nuclear power in a plant, but the reality is that enormous quantities of fossil fuel are burned in order to mine, mill and enrich the uranium needed to fuel the plant, as well as construct the enormous reactor itself.  In fact, a nuclear power plant must operate for at least a decade before all the energy consumed to build and fuel the plant has been earned back and the power plant begins to produce <em>net</em> energy.</p>
<p>Even the &#8216;harmless&#8217; vapor that emits from the cooling towers are detrimental to the environment. Thermal pollution from nuclear power plants adversely affects marine ecosystems. &#8220;Once-through&#8221; cooling systems in use at half the U.S. nuclear reactors discharge billions of gallons of water per day at temperatures hotter than the water into which it flows.</p>
<p>In addition, according to a Public Citizen fact sheet, the typical reactor will generate 20 to 30 tons of high-level nuclear waste annually. There is no known way to safely dispose of this waste, which remains dangerously radioactive that remains that way for a quarter of a million years. In fact, the mere process of isolating this waste from humans and the environment guzzles even more fuel.</p>
<p>Nuclear power plants present unique safety and security risks. A severe accident or attack at a nuclear plant could be absolutely catastrophic. And accidents do happen. Chernobyl, Three Mile Island and the David-Besse plant near Toledo, Ohio which came dangerously close to disaster when acid corroded a hole in its reactor head. Remember the scare that occurred when al-Qaeda considered attacking U.S. nuclear power plants.</p>
<p>The nuclear industry is one that is cost-inefficient and is propped up by government subsidies. These subsidies give nuclear energy an unfair and undesirable advantage over other types of safe and clean alternative energies.<br />
But the matter of the fact is, no amount of tax dollars will make nuclear energy any safer, cleaner or more economical.</p>
<p>The hawks who push the nuclear agenda as a cost-efficient and clean source of energy clearly do not think of the cost of storing nuclear waste for quarter of a million years, the expense to the government for subsidizing uranium enrichment and the nuclear industry&#8217;s liability in the case of accidents. Clearly, advocates of &#8216;clean&#8217; nuclear energy never bothered to find out that the Paducah uranium enrichment facility in Kentucky requires the electrical output of two 1000-megawatt coal-fired plants.</p>
<p>Nuclear power is not green and is absolutely not clean. Routinely emitted gases are unregulated because the <em>nuclear industry</em>, with no oversight, decided that they are biologically inconsequential. These inconsequential gases include radioactive isotopes such as xenon, krypton and argon which emit high-energy gamma radiation, which can mutate genes in reproductive cells.</p>
<p>Left unchecked, nuclear power plants will leave a toxic wasteland for our future generations.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s high time the world did something about it.</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.attorney.org/nuclear-power.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Renewable Energy</title>
		<link>http://www.attorney.org/renewable-energy.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.attorney.org/renewable-energy.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Image Gallery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternative energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[preserve natural resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wind power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.attorney.org/?p=706</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[


There are plenty of reasons to look forward to a United States government that embraces alternative energy sources. Alternative and renewable sources of energy shows promise in helping to reduce the amount of harmful emissions that we release into our ecosystem. It also helps preserve the natural resources that we currently use as sources of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-family: Verdana; color: #000000; font-size: 10pt;"></p>
<div>
<div id="attachment_707" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><img class="size-full wp-image-707" title="Renewable Energy" src="http://www.attorney.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Renewable-Energy.jpg" alt="Renewable Energy" width="480" height="270" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Renewable Energy</p></div>
</div>
<div>There are plenty of reasons to look forward to a United States government that embraces alternative energy sources. Alternative and renewable sources of energy shows promise in helping to reduce the amount of harmful emissions that we release into our ecosystem. It also helps preserve the natural resources that we currently use as sources of energy, in turn, this may help our global financial system break away from its dependence on oil as a source of growth and avoid future &#8216;oil shocks&#8217;.</p>
<p>Here are some of the most promising sources of alternative/renewable energy that are currently being used today:</p>
<p><strong>Wind Power</p>
<p></strong>Wind propels the blades of a wind turbine, in turn the rotational movement is converted into an electrical current by means of an electrical generator. It&#8217;s similar to older windmills, which manually converted the rotational motion using gears to turn mechanical machinery to do physical work. Now, wind towers are located mostly on &#8216;wind farms&#8217; and connected to national power grids.</p>
<p><em>Pros</em><br />
- No pollution.<br />
- Infinite source.</p>
<p><em>Cons<br />
</em>- Wind power is intermittent.<br />
- Large wind farms, or even individual turbines, can be extremely ugly. Many communities take a NIMBY approach to the idea. (Not In My Back Yard)</p>
<p><strong>Solar Power</strong></p>
<p>Solar power works by trapping the sun&#8217;s rays in solar cell where it is then converted into electricity. As long as the sun exists, we will have solar power.</p>
<p><em>Pros<br />
</em><br />
- Solar power generation releases no water or air pollution.<br />
- Infinite source</p>
<p><em>Cons</em></p>
<p>-Intermittent source<br />
-Solar power stations are extremely expensive<br />
-Production of solar cells is not environmentally friendly</p>
<p><strong>Geothermal Energy</strong></p>
<p>Geothermal energy harnesses heat deep under the surface of the Earth. Hot rocks underground heat water to produce steam. These areas are drilled into and the steam that shoots up is used to drive turbines.</p>
<p><em>Pros</p>
<p></em>-If done correctly, geothermal energy produces no harmful by-products<br />
-Once built, a plant is generally self-sufficient<br />
-Plants are usually small, and minimally mars the landscape</p>
<p><em>Cons</em></p>
<p>-If done incorrectly, drilling for geothermal energy can release hazardous minerals and gases<br />
-Not infinite, the sites are prone to running out of steam.</p></div>
<p></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.attorney.org/renewable-energy.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Plateau&#8217; Oil</title>
		<link>http://www.attorney.org/plateau-oil.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.attorney.org/plateau-oil.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Image Gallery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[petroleum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plateau oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water distribution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.attorney.org/?p=703</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Plateau oil, it&#8217;s the theory that conventional oil production is approaching its practical limit and will level off once it reaches that point. On the contrary, &#8216;peak&#8217; oil is a similar theory that predicts that once oil production hits its peak, it will decline rapidly.
The issue with crude is not one so much of &#8216;running [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_704" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><img src="http://www.attorney.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Plateau-oil.jpg" alt="Plateau oil" title="Plateau oil" width="480" height="270" class="size-full wp-image-704" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Plateau oil</p></div>
<p>Plateau oil, it&#8217;s the theory that conventional oil production is approaching its practical limit and will level off once it reaches that point. On the contrary, &#8216;peak&#8217; oil is a similar theory that predicts that once oil production hits its peak, it will decline rapidly.</p>
<p>The issue with crude is not one so much of &#8216;running out&#8217; but not having enough to keep our economy growing. The ramifications of not enough oil can be compared to the effects of dehydration for the human body. The human body is 70% water. Meaning a 200 pound man holds 140 pounds of water. The man doesn&#8217;t need to lose all his water weight to collapse from dehydration, a loss as little as 10-15 pounds of water may be enough to kill him. In a similar manner, an oil based economy, like the United States, doesn&#8217;t need to deplete its entire reserve of oil before it starts to collapse. A shortfall of even 10% would be enough to shatter the economy due to skyrocketing oil costs. In future decades, this problem will only be aggravated by a growing population.</p>
<p>In the 1970&#8217;s a 5% drop in production caused prices to triple in the 1970&#8217;s. Imagine what would happen if there were a 25% or even a 50% drop in production following an oil &#8216;peak&#8217;.</p>
<p>As an individual, you may wonder how bad it could really be. Maybe you will just start driving less, or start taking public transportation. But chances are, public transportation will become to costly for municipalities to provide. The effects of an oil shortage go far beyond your daily commute. The cost of nearly everything will rise as most manufacturing is done in some form of oil-burning factory. Think about it, in the United States, most of our food comes from massive farms and factories located in Middle America, where land prices allow companies to acquire such large parcels of land. This means much of the food reaching either coast will travel over 1,000 miles to reach its destination, usually, by means of a diesel-guzzling semi-trailer.</p>
<p>Modern medicine, water distribution, defense projects, and agriculture all require oil or petroleum derived chemicals to keep the industry moving. Plastics, computers and other high tech devices all need mass quantities of oil to be produced. Even the internet accounts for a whopping 10% of electricity demand in the U.S., according to a 2007 UClue study.</p>
<p>In fact, even alternative energy systems, such as solar panels and wind turbines, use petroleum and petroleum derived chemicals during manufacturing. In fact, all electrical devices use silver, copper, aluminum and platinum which is all discovered, extracted, and fashioned using oil or natural gas powered machinery.</p>
<p>The entire global financial system is dependent on an ever-increasing supply of oil. Beyond the creature comforts oil provides, this is arguably the key issue behind the &#8216;peak&#8217; or &#8216;plateau&#8217; oil theory. The world&#8217;s oil supply is finite and thus the foundation our global financial system lays on is unsustainable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.attorney.org/plateau-oil.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Save Our Water</title>
		<link>http://www.attorney.org/save-our-water.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.attorney.org/save-our-water.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Image Gallery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ocean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[save lifes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Save Our Water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[save water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water organization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.attorney.org/?p=699</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every day, thousands of people die from lack of access to clean water. According to Water.org fact sheets, only 62% of the world&#8217;s population has access to improved sanitation &#8212; defined as a sanitation facility that ensures hygienic separation of human excreta from human contact. The majority of illness in the world is caused by [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_700" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><img src="http://www.attorney.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Save-Our-Water.jpg" alt="Save Our Water" title="Save Our Water" width="480" height="270" class="size-full wp-image-700" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Save Our Water</p></div>
<p>Every day, thousands of people die from lack of access to clean water. According to Water.org fact sheets, only 62% of the world&#8217;s population has access to improved sanitation &#8212; defined as a sanitation facility that ensures hygienic separation of human excreta from human contact. The majority of illness in the world is caused by fecal matter. In addition, also according to Water.org fact sheets, every 15 seconds, a child dies from a water-related disease and children in poor environments often carry 1,000 parasitic worms in their bodies at any time.</p>
<p>Of all the water on earth, 97.5% is salt water, and of the remaining 2.5% fresh water, about 70% is frozen in the polar icecaps. The remaining 30% is moisture in the soil or lies in underground aquifers. Only about 0.0007% of the world&#8217;s fresh water is readily accessible for human use.</p>
<p>Without water, life would not exist, yet nearly one billion people lack access to clean water. More than twice that amount don&#8217;t have access to toilets.</p>
<p>Clean water is something we take for granted in most developed nations. But just 100 years ago, cities like New York and Paris were centers of infectious disease. In the end, it was sweeping reforms in water and sanitation that enabled human and economic development to leap forward. In fact, a poll by the British Medical Journal in 2007 found that clean water and sanitation were the most important medical advances since 1840.</p>
<p>According to a fact sheet from Water.org, a not for profit clean water advocacy group, the health and economic impacts of today’s global water crisis are staggering.</p>
<p>   1. More than 3.5 million people die each year from water-related disease; 84 percent are children. Nearly all deaths, 98 percent, occur in the developing world.<br />
   2. Lack of access to clean water and sanitation kills children at a rate equivalent of a jumbo jet crashing every four hours.<br />
   3. Lack of sanitation is the world’s biggest cause of infection.<br />
   4. Millions of women and children spend several hours each day collecting water from distant, often polluted sources. This is time not spent working at an income-generating job, caring for family members, or attending school.<br />
   5. 443 million school days are lost each year due to water-related illness.</p>
<p>Industrialized nations now have the know how to bring people clean water and improved sanitation. But global leaders are still sitting on their hands waiting for a magic cure to the clean water problem. Simple and economical solutions are available, yet millions will die this year from lack of access to clean water and lack of any water at all. This has to change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.attorney.org/save-our-water.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Climate Change</title>
		<link>http://www.attorney.org/climate-change.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.attorney.org/climate-change.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 19:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Image Gallery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overwhelming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[temperature]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.attorney.org/?p=665</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How significant is global warming? Historically speaking, it means relatively little, as the Earth has experienced extreme fluctuations in temperature &#8211; from long periods of warmth to ice ages. However, I&#8217;d like to lay out some of the realities by examining some of the persistent myths surrounding global warming.
Myth 1: We don&#8217;t really know if [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_666" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><img src="http://www.attorney.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Climate-Change.jpg" alt="Climate Change" title="Climate Change" width="480" height="270" class="size-full wp-image-666" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Climate Change</p></div>
<p>How significant is global warming? Historically speaking, it means relatively little, as the Earth has experienced extreme fluctuations in temperature &#8211; from long periods of warmth to ice ages. However, I&#8217;d like to lay out some of the realities by examining some of the persistent myths surrounding global warming.</p>
<p>Myth 1: We don&#8217;t really know if the climate is changing or, if it is, why.</p>
<p>Myth Debunked: There is an overwhelming consensus in the scientific community that the earth is warming, that this warming trend will worse, and that post-industrial human activity is to blame. In fact, when President Bush, who was among those who doubted the science, asked the National Academy of Sciences to conduct a special review, their well-balanced staff that contained more than just a few skeptics came back with the same conclusion: the planet is getting warmer and we are at blame. How significant is global warming? Just ask the people of Alaska, where roads are crumbling and homes sagging as the permafrost begins to melt. While the Earth&#8217;s temperature has always fluctuated, those changed generally occurred over several centuries or millenia. Today, these changed are happening within decades. In fact, scientists predict that over the next century average global temperature will rise two to ten degrees Fahrenheit.</p>
<p>Myth 2: Even if the Earth is warming, it may be more beneficial than dangerous.</p>
<p>Myth Debunked: Sure, a warming Earth may contribute to more fertile grounds, some previously covered by frost or long winters, but this effect will inevitably be reversed in other areas of the world. In the long term, any benefits are eventually outweighed. We will face increased flooding and increased drought. Extended heat waves, more powerful storms, and other extreme weather events will become more common. Rising sea level and storm surges will threaten communities along any coastline and taint water aquifers and reservoirs.</p>
<p>Myth 3: There is so much uncertainty, about scientific challenges and economic implications, that it would simply be better to wait for better information before we decide how to respond.</p>
<p>Myth Debunked: Now is not the time to wait. Even the current level of greenhouse gases is enough to leave the Earth feeling warming effects for decades to come. Right now, there is about 40 percent more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere than there was at the dawn of the Industrial Revolution. The concentration of carbon dioxide is projected to reach twice the pre-industrial levels by the middle of this century.This doubling of carbon dioxide emissions is the scenario most scientists have relied on in projecting the likely impacts of global warming.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not going to sit here and say that humans are in imminent danger of being wiped off the face of the planet, like the dinosaurs, but I think it does come down to a similar factor: the dinosaurs were wiped out because they couldn&#8217;t adjust to new realities. Unless humans learn to do a better job of adjusting to these new realities, we will also pay a heavy price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.attorney.org/climate-change.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Russian and Brazilian Deforestation</title>
		<link>http://www.attorney.org/deforestation.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.attorney.org/deforestation.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 23:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Image Gallery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[animals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brazil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deforestation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government interventions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.attorney.org/?p=625</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[


Russia and Brazil have, respectively, the two highest percentages of forest land in the world.  Russia&#8217;s forests comprise about 22% of the world&#8217;s forests in an area that is equivalent in size to the United States, while Brazil&#8217;s forests make about 16% of the world&#8217;s forests in its famous Amazon rainforests.  These forests, however, are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-family: Verdana; color: #000000; font-size: 10pt;"></p>
<div>
<div id="attachment_626" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><img class="size-full wp-image-626" title="Deforestation" src="http://www.attorney.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Deforestation.jpg" alt="Deforestation" width="480" height="270" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Deforestation</p></div>
</div>
<div>Russia and Brazil have, respectively, the two highest percentages of forest land in the world.  Russia&#8217;s forests comprise about 22% of the world&#8217;s forests in an area that is equivalent in size to the United States, while Brazil&#8217;s forests make about 16% of the world&#8217;s forests in its famous Amazon rainforests.  These forests, however, are also afflicted with some of the highest rates of deforestation, a process that destroys valuable habitats for hundreds of species of plants and animals, as well as causing erosion and poor soil quality, which causes problems for people who live in the areas.  Despite this persistent threat and government interventions, deforestation continue to remain high in both countries, threatening lives and livelihoods of man and nature alike.</div>
<div></div>
<div>In July of this year, Brazil announced that it had achieved the lowest rate of deforestation in 21 years following a 45% drop in monthly deforested acres.  This, of course, is an auspicious number, though it comes two years after a 350% upward spike in deforestation punctured otherwise hopeful plans for the effectiveness of governmental regulations.  Brazil has traditionally had the highest rate of deforestation of any country in the world, and as recently as 2005 had the highest number of acres deforested annually.  Furthermore, this deofrestation often entails forest burning to clear space for agriculture, which not only destroys Amazon areas as a carbon dioxide sink, but actively relases new pollutants into the air.  The main problem Brazil currently suffers with combating deforestation is in the amount of money it would require to compensate loggers so as to encourage them out of logging.  Despite drops in deforestation, it is estimated that the Amazon will be about 40% of its original size by 2030.</div>
<div></div>
<div>In Russia, information is much harder to obtain.  Though the government attempts to regulate deforestation, its impact assessments are often years out of date and give factually incorrect information.  Furthermore, illegal logging is rampant, and far exceeds the legal logging quotas set by the out of touch government agencies.  Most estimates suggest that Russia loses anywhere from 2 to 4 million hectares of land annualy to logging, though studies suggest that number could be increasing.  China has traditionally had high deforestation rates, but due to new government regulations, Chinese manufacturers have begun to search for wood from international sources with fewer regulations, such as Russia, most especially in the Chinese-Russian border areas.  This is particularly damaging to Russia where the harsh temperatures force longer recovery periods for the forests.</div>
<div></div>
<div>All in all, this deforestation is clearly damaging.  Estimates suggest that the lost rainforest in Brazil could account for as much as 10% of global warming due to the loss of Amazon acres as a heat sink.  If information was as readily available in Russia, it is probable that similar disastrous effects could be seen there as well.  This is clearly an issue that needs to be accounted for, and soon, as it affects not only the ecosystems of the two countries, but the quality of life worldwide.</div>
<p></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.attorney.org/deforestation.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pfizer Helps Restructure US Land Use Laws, Then Leaves</title>
		<link>http://www.attorney.org/land-use.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.attorney.org/land-use.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 23:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Image Gallery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Land Use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citizens of New London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Land Use Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pfizer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.attorney.org/?p=622</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 


Citizens of New London, Connecticut have expressed their displeasure over Pfizer&#8217;s plan to leave the city.  Eight years ago, when the city of New London looked to bolster its floundering economy, Pfizer stepped in and purchased a 26 acre plot under a deal with the city government that it would pay just one-fifth of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-family: Verdana; color: #000000; font-size: 10pt;"> </span></p>
<div>
<div id="attachment_623" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><img class="size-full wp-image-623" title="Citizens of New London" src="http://www.attorney.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Citizens-of-New-London.jpg" alt="Citizens of New London" width="480" height="270" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Citizens of New London</p></div>
</div>
<div>Citizens of New London, Connecticut have expressed their displeasure over Pfizer&#8217;s plan to leave the city.  Eight years ago, when the city of New London looked to bolster its floundering economy, Pfizer stepped in and purchased a 26 acre plot under a deal with the city government that it would pay just one-fifth of its property taxes for the first decade.  Part of this move was spurred on by the New London Development Corporation, which the city had originally set up to forcibly purchase nine acres of residential property using eminent domain laws in an attempt to commercialize the town.  City residents, outraged, sued the town to keep their land all the way up to the Supreme Court level, where they lost in highly contested 5-4 decision that helped to rewrite the power of land use laws in this nation.</div>
<div>Now the residents have lost their homes, and Pfizer has left the city, taking 1400 jobs with it.  Though Pfizer had little to do with this seized land, residents are outraged as the city&#8217;s plan to bring in funding has now left them with double-failings: loss of home and work.  Pfizer says that the move was calculated to bring them better earnings and that most of the jobs will be moved to nearby Groton, Connecticut, but this is little consolation to the residents.  The acquired land is now barren with no developers to build the proposed condominiums, hotels, and stores, and the empty Pfizer complex stands as an empty eyesore, with no bids for a replacement company.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.attorney.org/land-use.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Atlanta Researcher Suggests Alternate Reason for Global Warming: Land Use</title>
		<link>http://www.attorney.org/global-warming.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.attorney.org/global-warming.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 23:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Image Gallery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atlanta Researcher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Land Use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.attorney.org/?p=619</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[


Georgia Tech researcher and Associate Professor of City and Regional Planning, Brian Stone, has recently suggested that poor land use law can help explain the global warming effect.  He cites information such as the fact that developed land often is created from cleared forest land, thus reducing the amount of absorbed carbon dioxide and replacing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<div>
<div id="attachment_620" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><img class="size-full wp-image-620" title="Global Warming" src="http://www.attorney.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Global-Warming.jpg" alt="Global Warming" width="480" height="270" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Global Warming</p></div>
</div>
<div>Georgia Tech researcher and Associate Professor of City and Regional Planning, Brian Stone, has recently suggested that poor land use law can help explain the global warming effect.  He cites information such as the fact that developed land often is created from cleared forest land, thus reducing the amount of absorbed carbon dioxide and replacing it with concrete that not only does not absorb carbon dioxide, but encourages greenhouse gas emissions (such as in the placement of parking lots, encouraging more cars in an area).  Furthermore, tree canopies work to decrease the surface temperature of the planet, while the concrete used in many highways and buildings actually works to reflect heat back into the atmosphere, further raising temperatures.</div>
</div>
<div>Moreover, covering the land in concrete and asphalt significantly reduces the amount of open soil to absorb rainwater, leading to high amounts of runoff that both take water away from urban areas, but cause high amounts of runoff and, thus, soil erosion when the rainwater finally encounters soil again.  All of these factors contribute to changing the land and in some ways encourage climate change, due to a reduction in natural processes of the earth.  Though it&#8217;s unlikely that all of these problems can be fixed, Stone suggests in his report that better city planning and land use law can certainly reduce the impact of replacing the natural world with our human-made one.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.attorney.org/global-warming.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Failings of Environmental Law to Reduce Carbon Emissions</title>
		<link>http://www.attorney.org/environmental-law.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.attorney.org/environmental-law.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 23:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Image Gallery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reduce Carbon Emissions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.attorney.org/?p=616</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[


Despite the recent rise in emissions awareness, a number of alarming new reports suggest that states are not doing enough to reduce emissions.  Florida, for instance, has seen a 36% increase in emissions since 1990, while New Jersey has seen a 16% increase.  New Jersey is surrounded by states such as Pennsylvania and New York [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<div>
<div id="attachment_617" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><img class="size-full wp-image-617" title="Failings of Environmental Law" src="http://www.attorney.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Failings-of-Environmental-Law.jpg" alt="Failings of Environmental Law" width="480" height="270" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Failings of Environmental Law</p></div>
</div>
<div>Despite the recent rise in emissions awareness, a number of alarming new reports suggest that states are not doing enough to reduce emissions.  Florida, for instance, has seen a 36% increase in emissions since 1990, while New Jersey has seen a 16% increase.  New Jersey is surrounded by states such as Pennsylvania and New York that have significantly higher emissions, but New Jersey has shown more of an increase than its surrounding areas.  Arizona, similarly, has seen a 61% increase in emissions since 1990, the highest rate of growth of any state.  Texas, meanwhile, has seen a reduction in emissions, but sill has the title of most greenhouse gas emissions of any state.</div>
</div>
<div>The study published by Environment America showed that emissions had gone down in only one-third of states since 2004, despite a nationwide movement to improve pollution awareness.  The majority of states had significant increases, especially between 2004 and 2007, though the nation as a whole has had a 19% increase in emissions since 1990.  This report, if nothing else, shows the need for better environmental laws, including the current proposition in the US Senate to pass a strict cap and trade bill designed to reduce industrial emissions nationwide by making them purchase pollution permits.  Overall, however, despite all of our positive efforts and auspicious conservation acts, we can see that our efforts to date have been as of yet not strong enough to make the significant changes that our country and our wildlife desperately need.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.attorney.org/environmental-law.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Difficulties with Environmental Law: Cost vs. Environment in Jacksonville, Fl.</title>
		<link>http://www.attorney.org/environmental.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.attorney.org/environmental.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 23:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Image Gallery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cost vs Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Atlantic Fishery Management Council]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.attorney.org/?p=612</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

The federal government is now working in Jacksonville, Florida to close fishing of red snapper fish.  The South Atlantic Fishery Management Council claims that the red snapper population is at only three percent of the sustainable limit, and is dropping.  Further fishing, they say, could seriously harm the red snapper population permanently.  Right now the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<div id="attachment_613" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><img class="size-full wp-image-613" title="Cost vs Environment" src="http://www.attorney.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Cost-vs-Environment.jpg" alt="Cost vs Environment" width="480" height="270" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Cost vs Environment</p></div>
</div>
<div>The federal government is now working in Jacksonville, Florida to close fishing of red snapper fish.  The South Atlantic Fishery Management Council claims that the red snapper population is at only three percent of the sustainable limit, and is dropping.  Further fishing, they say, could seriously harm the red snapper population permanently.  Right now the federal government has proposed a 35 year ban on red snapper fishing, in order to give these fish time to restock their populations.  This ban would stop bottom fishing from the Carolinas to central Florida, also closing a number of other types of fishing that have affected the red snapper populations through accidental fishing.</div>
<div>But local fishermen claim this is a farce.  They say that red snapper population is as high as its ever been, mainly due to the environmental laws already put into place.  Furthermore, they claim a loss of livelihood would be the main product of this new ban, affecting industries from fishing to boating, mechanics, restaurants, and tourism, as just a beginning step.  This environmental ban could furthermore put a number of fishing companies out of business, and the fishermen claim that this loss of economy is far more damaging than their work.  Clearly, the issue at stake here is the effects of environmental laws.  Every law will have to weigh the relative benefits to nature versus cost to the economy, and must take an ethical view to decide at what cost one can or should be sacrificed</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.attorney.org/environmental.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
